07-13-04 Tornadoes Rated: IL & WI, Roanoke IL F3 so far
Posted in: zjnq.com Date: March 13th, 2010

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LINCOLN IL
810 PM CDT WED JUL 14 2004
...INITIAL SURVEY RESULTS OF ROANOKE TORNADO ON JULY 13...
...DAMAGE POTENTIALLY GREATER THAN F3 -- FURTHER SURVEYS TO BE
CONDUCTED ON THURSDAY...
http://kamala.cod.edu/offs/KILX/0407150110.nous43.html
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE QUAD CITIES IA IL
525 PM CDT TUE JUL 13 2004
...RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE STORM DAMAGE SURVEY FOR
BUREAU COUNTY IN NORTHWEST ILLINOIS...
http://kamala.cod.edu/offs/KDVN/0407132230.abus34.html
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE GREEN BAY WI
605 PM CDT WED JUL 14 2004
...RESULTS OF STORM DAMAGE SURVEY IN MANITOWOC COUNTY...
http://kamala.cod.edu/offs/KGRB/0407142303.abus34.html
Some additional links on the Roanoke storm:
http://www.pantagraph.com/
http://www.pjstar.com/
http://week.com/Default.asp
http://www.hoinews.com/
http://www.wmbd.com/news.asp
http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ilx/events/jul132004/jul13.php
Mike
http://mgweather.com
How did that prevent the stuff in WI many hours later from forming to begin with? Why did the storms in MI moves east instead of southeast?
- Rob
I feel your pain, (well not literally lol).
I sat here like an idiot and watched the supercell pass aboout 75 miles to my east, beautiful overshooting top. I kept thinking something would fire off to the west closer to my area where the cape was near 7,000!! The towers in my area were rather healthy, but they just couldn't break that strong 700mb cap. At one point the temperature was 92, with a 79Td making the heat index 108.
I'm just very glad no one was severely injured or killed from this tornado!
- Rob
My guess is that the air was still "sinking" across that region... Storms in WI did actually develop, but they never reached into the northern IL region (where the subsidence was).
My guess as to the storm motion would have to be the way the 500mb trough was moving, as well as the 1000-500mb thickness, and mid level winds... These components are all easterly here in MI, whereas across southern IL, they are more southerly (and when looped, the convection does follow the heights/thickness/wind).
The lack of development in northern IL may have saved IN/OH from an already initiated line of convection moving through (that that other individual storms/lines couldn't form).
Here is an image with the 1km satellite with various parameters overlayed:
http://www.waveformpc.com/subsidence2.gif
BTW Rob... The new static IP is slated for Tuesday... I don't have much experience in "allow lines" using the LDM, so I may need to run through the man pages (send me a PM with any suggestions on this)...
"By the way, I have been
informed that a National Weather Service senior storm analyst from
Washington DC is heading for Roanoke, IL. That tornado on Tuesday,
produced by this frontal system, may be an F4 or F5 intensity tornado on
the Fujita damage scale (winds of 260 MPH or higher). Two homes were
scoured away in Roanoke. He will be on site this afternoon to do a
detailed analysis. If this is an F4 or higher...it will be the first
since the May 9, 1995 Cantrall, IL tornado, which was rated F4."
:shock:
http://www.parsonscompany.com/images/plant.jpg
After:
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/071404_ns_twister.html
Started a new thread:
http://www.stormtrack.org/forum/posting.ph...ditpost&p=28359 (http://www.stormtrack.org/forum/posting.php?mode=editpost&p=28359)
Mike
- Rob
Aaron
I wouldn't of headed down there unless I had some chase equipment like all these professionals. That supercell's outflow managed to fire off numerous other storms. Could of really been dangerous. The shield of mammatus clouds was just amazing. :D
Joel:
There was an F4 last year in IL on May 6 in Southern Illinois.
I feel your pain, (well not literally lol).
I sat here like an idiot and watched the supercell pass aboout 75 miles to my east, beautiful overshooting top. I kept thinking something would fire off to the west closer to my area where the cape was near 7,000!! The towers in my area were rather healthy, but they just couldn't break that strong 700mb cap. At one point the temperature was 92, with a 79Td making the heat index 108.
I'm just very glad no one was severely injured or killed from this tornado!
It was actually those supercells that saved northern IL/IN/OH from a pretty intense derecho. The subsidence behind the supercells supressed any further convection across northern IL, even with good instability/shear...
Kind of ironic...
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |
